Sunday, May 30, 2010

How does a pendulum work?

I started the guided inquiry lesson on pendulums by examining many materials. Inquiry-based approaches focus on students developing their own experiments as opposed to teacher-transmitted information (Banchi & Bell, 2008). I drew on my prior knowledge of how pendulums work and decided on using a fishing line, large paper clips, tape, wood doweling, ruler, and scissors. The Engage stage in the 5E model has students connect with past learning experiences and relate them to the present situation (Hammerman, 2006). I felt there was a missing component, which was the discussion stage. I did not have anyone to suggest different scenarios for testing by using the materials I had laid out. Students build on each other’s suggestions and perspectives, which is why I like to group or partner my students.

The next step was to create my experiment. This again is the next step in the 5E model called the Explore stage. During the reflective process, I actively constructed how I would investigate my inquiry by trial and error. I decided to tape my dowel between two desks. Since this kind of inquiry involves more student input than confirmation or structured methodologies, I had to choose the size of the weight, the length of the line, the height at which the bob would be released, and how far apart the desks would be. I had to make hypotheses and test my predictions. Even though in an inquiry-based lesson the teacher only provides students with the research question and takes a passive role, it would be an opportune time to inform the students how scientists could still learn from what happens in every investigation (Lantz, 2009). The students suggest many wonderful ideas to investigate. Some would work and some would not, but the teacher’s role would help teach students that scientists sometimes start over or design a new experiment when the data does not support the hypothesis. This process sparks additional inquiry. By acknowledging the similarity between what scientists do and what students do, I hope to promote an interest in STEM professions among my students (Lantz, 2009). As for my inquiry, I changed different angle positions. I investigated whether I could hold the bob directly above the hanger and get a smooth swing. I questioned if the pendulum would swing longer if it is released from a higher angle and at what angle would I get the longest period of swinging.

This led me to draw my conclusions. In a classroom, students would generate an explanation supported by the evidence they had collected (Banchi & Bell, 2008). In the Explain stage of the 5E model as well as in an inquiry-based lesson, students communicate and make sense of what they learned. The collaboration between peers and the teacher will further the understanding of the subject. Since I teach 3rd grade, I need to address misconception as we summarize what is learned.

The Extend stage is for further inquiry to expand my knowledge. I decided to test two bobs at the same time by making one twice as heavy. I was interested in knowing whether they swung at the same rhythm or if the weight of the bob affects its swing. Then, I tested two of the same weight but shortened one of the lines. I found that one swing always moved more slowly. I also counted the number of swings each bob took with the help of a partner and observed which pendulum kept swinging longer. In addition, I made a connection to other related concepts. The wrecking ball is an example of the pendulum power. I even thought of Tarzan swinging from tree to tree. This would help the students understand the world around them in connection with the investigation.

The final stage is the Evaluation. I recommend using diverse assessments. I used a journal to write my questions as well as my observations. I even drew diagrams of how I would construct the different scenarios. Another type of assessment I would use to supplement or replace traditional formats is for the students to present their design and their findings to the class.

References

Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2),

26–29. Use the Education Research Complete database and search using the article’s Accession Number:34697743.

Hammerman, E.L. (2006). Becoming a better science teacher: 8 steps to high quality

instruction and student achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Lantz, H.B. (2009). What should be the function of a k-12 STEM educator? SEEN

Magazine, 11(3).

Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2010c). Virtual Field Experience:

Science Lesson. The nature of science. Baltimore, MD: Author

No comments:

Post a Comment